<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sustain Me</title>
	<atom:link href="http://carthik.net/blog/vault/2006/01/29/sustain-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://carthik.net/blog/vault/2006/01/29/sustain-me/</link>
	<description>Life, Research and Everything Else.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 16:30:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James E. Robinson, III</title>
		<link>http://carthik.net/blog/vault/2006/01/29/sustain-me/comment-page-1/#comment-9669</link>
		<dc:creator>James E. Robinson, III</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 12:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carthik.net/blog/vault/2006/01/29/sustain-me/#comment-9669</guid>
		<description>Do they consider post-consumable waste and consumer habits as a result of the market?

Companies can do their best on the front side to conserve/reuse/be green, etc on the manufacturing side, but when products are priced to be cheaper than replacing a single part, what have we gained?

The classic example is the printer industry.  Last time i needed to buy ink, i tossed my old printer and bought a new one.  At the current prices, when i run out of ink again, i&#039;ll do the same.  (Actually, i&#039;ll buy a laser if my wife can get by without color to try and stop the insanity.)

But this shows up in so many other market segments now.  Lawnmower break?  It&#039;ll be a min. of $100 for parts and labor.  New one = $120.  Bulb out in your strand of Christmas tree lights?  A replacement bulb pack is $2...so is a whole new strand of 150 lights.

The price of those items does not include the disposal cost.

I&#039;m not a fan of dumping lots of stuff, but i have to be responsible with my money as well...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do they consider post-consumable waste and consumer habits as a result of the market?</p>
<p>Companies can do their best on the front side to conserve/reuse/be green, etc on the manufacturing side, but when products are priced to be cheaper than replacing a single part, what have we gained?</p>
<p>The classic example is the printer industry.  Last time i needed to buy ink, i tossed my old printer and bought a new one.  At the current prices, when i run out of ink again, i&#8217;ll do the same.  (Actually, i&#8217;ll buy a laser if my wife can get by without color to try and stop the insanity.)</p>
<p>But this shows up in so many other market segments now.  Lawnmower break?  It&#8217;ll be a min. of $100 for parts and labor.  New one = $120.  Bulb out in your strand of Christmas tree lights?  A replacement bulb pack is $2&#8230;so is a whole new strand of 150 lights.</p>
<p>The price of those items does not include the disposal cost.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not a fan of dumping lots of stuff, but i have to be responsible with my money as well&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel Makower</title>
		<link>http://carthik.net/blog/vault/2006/01/29/sustain-me/comment-page-1/#comment-9668</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Makower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 05:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carthik.net/blog/vault/2006/01/29/sustain-me/#comment-9668</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Carthik, for the plug!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Carthik, for the plug!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

